Early Christmas present for residents of Bristol tower block
How’s this for an unexpected Christmas present: lower heating bills for life?
That’s what residents of Rawnsley House in Bristol are getting. The entire block of flats is being clad with heat-saving solid wall insulation – and it’s arriving just in time for the coldest months of the year. Our EPC show how valuable this Christmas wrapping could be.
The giver is none other than their landlord, Bristol City Council (how many of us are expecting Christmas gifts from our landlords?) And unlike some energy efficiency measures, this one’s very visible: you can really see what you’re getting (see photo below)…
Christmas wrapping for council tenants
OK, so it’s probably not just a splurge of seasonal generosity. Rawnsley House is the latest of many council properties in Bristol to receive an energy efficiency upgrade. It probably doesn’t have a lot to do with making it easier on residents’ wallets. It doesn’t even have much to do with reducing CO2 emissions.
It’s mostly because the Council needs to get 100% of its homes meeting the Decent Homes Standard by 2010. One of the four components of that standard is thermal comfort, meaning that properties need their insulation brought up to scratch.
So far, they’ve made good progress towards this goal. In April 2004, 59.8% of Bristol council homes met the Decent Homes standard; in April 2009, this was up to 93%.In the thermal comfort category, they’ve achieved this by first going for the easiest and most obvious improvements: loft insulation and cavity wall insulation across thousands of small homes (the low-hanging fruit, you might say).
Now it’s time to tackle the remaining 7%, including big projects such as the high-rise housing blocks (the high hanging fruit?)
These required a different solution. Blocks of flats like this already tend to be more efficient than small homes. Heat loss through floors and ceilings – two of the areas we examine for an EPC – can be discounted in all but the top and bottom flats. These blocks have one main weakness: solid exterior walls, which are no good unless insulated. A solid-wall building takes a bit more work to insulate than cavity walls: you can do it internally, or in this case, get outside and clad it…
There are four main reasons why I’m writing about this. Believe it or not, it isn’t just because of a tenuous link to Christmas…
1.Solid wall insulation works
Not just because it’s visually rewarding to watch the cladding go up – there’s more to this than pretty pictures!
Rawnsley House provides a great “before and after” example of the efficiency improvements brought about by exterior cladding. Bristol City Council works with Horizon exclusively to carry out its EPCs, so we have some actual figures to go on, based on our assessments of the premises:
Before: solid walls, no cladding
At this point, the estimated heating costs are £378 a year, and the estimated carbon dioxide emissions 3.8 tonnes per year. Now compare that to an EPC carried out on one of the flats after cladding was completed…
After: solid walls with exterior insulating panels
Solid wall insulation has changed the game significantly: the estimated heating costs have plummeted to £220 a year, and the estimated carbon dioxide emissions to 2.6 tonnes per year.
Multiply these figures out by the 99 flats in this particular block and you can see how significant an effect this measure will have:
- CO2 emissions for this building will be reduced by 119 tonnes year on year
- The reduction in heating costs benefits each resident personally – see point 4 below.
The installation is cost effective too. The payoff with solid wall insulation is usually within 8 years, which is quicker than installing an A-rated boiler and a lot quicker than converting to double glazing.
2. Retrofitting is an urgent necessity
The government has committed us to a rapid improvement in the energy efficiency of new build homes. However, in terms of meeting our CO2 emissions targets, improving our existing buildings is going to be far more important.
We’re only going to achieve this if we take retrofitting seriously. According to the DTI, by 2050 two thirds of the total emissions from household energy will be derived from houses already standing. Amidst all the focus on new building standards, our existing housing stock is like the elephant in the room (for more on this, read Martin Hunt’s special report “The Future Is Retro-Fit”).
Like the council, we need to prioritise the easy, big wins such as fitting insulation where none (or inadequate measures) exist.
3. It’s the public sector showing the way
I recommend this sort of improvement in EPCs, but homeowners in the private sector rarely carry them out.
Councils have a statutory requirement to act, but private households and landlords are going to need some kind of incentive. Fortunately, Rawnsley House gives us a great example here of the benefits of acting on your EPC recommendations. Perhaps it won’t be long before the Government introduces measures to encourage the private sector to catch up.
4. Cash back!
Never mind the CO2 for a minute, check out the cash benefits for the residents. Although it wasn’t Bristol City Council’s main aim, a nice side benefit for the residents is that it will also save them a chunk of their annual electricity spend. This is where the Christmas present bit comes in.
In the illustration above, each resident is set to save £158 a year, or just over £13 a month, on their electricity bill. It’s the most straightforward reason why people should act on their EPC recommendations: it saves them money, now and in years to come.
So… does this count as a Christmas present?
Yes, of sorts: the residents haven’t had to invest in the insulation themselves, and they’ll be delighted to see those savings materialise in 2010. They’ll be wishing the council a Happy New Year!
But there are other reasons why this fits with the season of goodwill. Retrofitting insulation is a smart move for CO2, and one that needs some publicity. The very visibility of Rawnsley House’s Christmas wrapping should spur on other building owners to retrofit their buildings. And if it isn’t too cheesy to say so, won’t that be a Christmas present to us all?
(Have a good one yourselves!)





3 Responses
The interesting thing is with the two EPCs – they both have a potential after low cost measures 12 points higher than the exisiting. These should be the cost effective measures that provide a greater return (speed of return and CO2 reduction per pound spent). So why were those more cost effective measures not carried out first?
That is an interesting point Tim. The answer I would suggest is in two parts.
Firstly that the logistics of making changes in this environment are complicated by the access issues to each flat.
Imagine trying to gain access to 99 flats to install the lower cost measures such as low energy lighting or a better heating system. It would be infinitely more difficult than attacking the exterior of the building in one foul swoop as there are so many human variables to contend with.
In my view pound for pound this was the most cost effective measure available, especially when you divide the cost of the installation by 99. It will quickly deliver tangible results whilst each flat can be dealt with on an individual basis when void. From a management stand point it’s the simplest way to approach the issue.
The second issue to consider is this. What is the point of providing a more efficient system to produce heat and lighting if the savings they produce are undermined by the building they are contained in?
You can heat a property with the most efficient system in the world but if you have no means to retain that heat your efficiencies are reduced as the system has to over deliver to maintain a comfortable living environment.
I found this article useful in a paper I am writing at university. Hopefully, I get an A+ now!
Thanks
Bernice Franklin